Vivo Life Perform Plant Protein vs EarthChamp Protein Powder

Pros

• ✓Exceptionally clean formula — stevia only, no artificial sweeteners, colours, or thickeners
• ✓Complete amino acid profile from pea + rice blend, reinforced with 5g fermented BCAAs per serving
• ✓Thoughtful functional additions: 250mg turmeric with 2.5mg Bioperine for enhanced bioavailability
• ✓Strong certification stack: Informed Sport (batch-tested), Vegan Society, Carbon Neutral

Cons

• ✗Flavour consistency is hit-or-miss — vanilla described as 'pretty disgusting' by one buyer; one chocolate variant reported as yellow and tasteless
• ✗Only 26 servings per 988g bag makes daily use expensive relative to less premium competitors
• ✗Can feel heavy on the stomach when used as a breakfast shake, particularly without added liquid
• ✗Turmeric content may stain shaker cups and teeth — at least one reviewer recommends using a straw

Best For

Pros

• ✓Exceptionally clean formula: no sucralose, no gums, no carrageenan, no soya, no added sugar or salt
• ✓Smooth texture and mild vanilla taste consistently praised — avoids the 'chalky/sawdust' issue common in plant proteins
• ✓Transparent brand: CEO personally responds to queries, Eurofins lab testing for heavy metals confirmed by manufacturer
• ✓Enriched with functional botanicals (baobab, flax, turmeric, cinnamon) plus 100% RDA of vitamins D, B6, and B12

Cons

• ✗Protein density lower than whey (~57g/100g vs 80–90% for whey), requiring larger servings for the same protein dose
• ✗Slight graininess reported by some users — inherent to plant-protein blends without gums
• ✗Vanilla flavour inconsistency: one reviewer found it artificial and overpowering compared to the chocolate variant
• ✗No formal third-party certification (Informed Sport, NSF, etc.) — Eurofins testing is periodic and not displayed on-pack

Best For