Form Performance Protein vs EarthChamp Protein Powder

Pros

• ✓Exceptional taste in Chocolate Peanut flavour — repeatedly praised as best-in-class among plant proteins
• ✓High 30g protein per serving from a complementary organic tri-blend (pea, brown rice, pumpkin seed) for a complete amino acid profile
• ✓Added digestive enzymes improve tolerability; curcumin + black pepper provide evidence-based anti-inflammatory support
• ✓Informed Sport certified — independently batch-tested, safe for competitive athletes

Cons

• ✗Premium price point: ~£40–50 for 500g makes cost-per-gram of protein high versus mainstream competitors
• ✗Powdery texture reported by a subset of users, particularly when mixed in milk rather than water or a blender
• ✗Some find the sweetness level excessive, especially in non-chocolate flavours
• ✗Two-scoop serving can mislead buyers comparing to single-scoop 20–25g products

Best For

Pros

• ✓Exceptionally clean formula: no sucralose, no gums, no carrageenan, no soya, no added sugar or salt
• ✓Smooth texture and mild vanilla taste consistently praised — avoids the 'chalky/sawdust' issue common in plant proteins
• ✓Transparent brand: CEO personally responds to queries, Eurofins lab testing for heavy metals confirmed by manufacturer
• ✓Enriched with functional botanicals (baobab, flax, turmeric, cinnamon) plus 100% RDA of vitamins D, B6, and B12

Cons

• ✗Protein density lower than whey (~57g/100g vs 80–90% for whey), requiring larger servings for the same protein dose
• ✗Slight graininess reported by some users — inherent to plant-protein blends without gums
• ✗Vanilla flavour inconsistency: one reviewer found it artificial and overpowering compared to the chocolate variant
• ✗No formal third-party certification (Informed Sport, NSF, etc.) — Eurofins testing is periodic and not displayed on-pack

Best For