Lily's Kitchen Puppy Chicken Wet vs Edgard & Cooper Puppy Duck & Chicken

Pros

• ✓Named chicken as primary protein — freshly prepared, not rendered or meal-based per brand claims
• ✓Visible meat, vegetables, and herbs reported by owners; no jelly filler like cheaper alternatives
• ✓Excellent palatability — most dogs eat eagerly and show excitement at feeding time
• ✓No reported digestive issues; well-tolerated across multiple reviews

Cons

• ✗Premium price point — among the more expensive puppy wet foods per 100g; several reviewers flag cost as a barrier
• ✗Portion size per tray (150g) may be insufficient as sole feeding for larger breed puppies, requiring multiple trays per meal
• ✗A small number of dogs lost interest after initial enthusiasm — palatability may not be consistent long-term for fussy eaters
• ✗Spec data indicates meat meal present, which contradicts brand marketing claims — ingredient list should be verified on-pack before purchase

Best For

Pros

• ✓Named meat sources (duck and chicken) — no generic by-products or meat meal
• ✓Grain-free and natural formula with no over-processed or dried meat
• ✓Prebiotics included to support healthy gut development in puppies
• ✓Strong palatability reported by fussy-dog owners switching from other premium brands

Cons

• ✗Palatability is inconsistent — a minority of dogs flatly refuse it with no clear pattern
• ✗150g portion sizes are small for large-breed puppies (25–45 kg), requiring multiple cups per meal
• ✗Grain-free formulas for large-breed puppies require careful calcium/phosphorus balancing — not always verifiable from marketing copy alone
• ✗Some non-English reviews suggest this product is widely distributed internationally but reviewed outside UK context, diluting UK-specific palatability signal

Best For