Skip to content

The Ordinary NMF + HA vs CeraVe Moisturising Cream

Side-by-side comparison of scores, ingredients, prices and real customer feedback for The Ordinary NMF + HA and CeraVe Moisturising Cream.

Last verified: 01 Mar 2026 · Based on 24 reviews

Our Verdict: The Ordinary NMF + HA or CeraVe Moisturising Cream?

The Ordinary edges ahead with a higher overall score (84 vs 83) and a lower price (£11.40 vs £13.11), making it the better pick for oily, combination, or sensitive skin seeking lightweight daily hydration. Choose CeraVe instead if you have dry to very dry skin or a compromised barrier — its ceramide trio actively repairs skin lipids in a way The Ordinary's humectant-focused formula cannot match.

— AIScored Editorial Team

84.0
Score Summary

The Ordinary NMF + HA scores 84.0/100 vs CeraVe Moisturising Cream at 83.0/100. The Ordinary NMF + HA wins on ingredient quality, skin compatibility, texture experience. CeraVe Moisturising Cream is stronger on effectiveness.

The Ordinary NMF + HA vs CeraVe Moisturising Cream: What Does the Data Say?

These two moisturisers sit in the same price bracket — £11.40 for The Ordinary NMF+HA versus £13.11 for CeraVe Moisturising Cream — but they're engineered for quite different skin situations. The Ordinary formula centres on Natural Moisturising Factors: amino acids, sodium PCA, urea, lactate, and polyglutamic acid that mimic what healthy skin already produces. It scores higher on ingredient quality (88/100) precisely because this NMF complex is genuinely biomimetic. CeraVe takes a different structural approach, delivering three physiological ceramides (NP, AP, EOP) alongside cholesterol to actively rebuild the lipid matrix in the skin barrier — the ingredients that hold skin cells together. Its lower ingredient quality score (81/100) reflects the sodium hyaluronate appearing late in the INCI, suggesting it's present in supporting rather than meaningful concentrations.

If your skin is normal to combination or oily and acne-prone, The Ordinary is the more sensible pick. It absorbs quickly, works as a makeup base, and its lightweight humectant profile won't block pores. CeraVe, with cetearyl alcohol, dimethicone, and caprylic/capric triglyceride in a rich, occlusive cream, carries a moderate comedogenic risk that oily skin types will likely notice. For dry to very dry skin, eczema-prone skin, or anyone post-procedure with a compromised barrier, CeraVe is the stronger clinical choice — the ceramide restoration it offers goes beyond surface hydration.

One practical note: The Ordinary's urea content, while beneficial for most, can cause mild tingling on freshly exfoliated or sensitised skin — worth bearing in mind if you're pairing it with actives. Both are fragrance-free and alcohol-free, so allergen concerns are minimal either way. Neither carries third-party certification. The Ordinary edges ahead on value (93/100 versus 89/100), and for most people with normal or combination skin it remains a very capable daily moisturiser.

How Do the Scores Compare?

The Ordinary Natural Moistu...
CeraVe Moisturising Cream, ...
The Ordinary Natural Moisturizing Factors + HA, Lightweight Hydrator for Skin Barrier Support & Hydration, 100ml
The Ordinary Natural Moistu...
The Ordinary
CeraVe Moisturising Cream, Face & Body, With 3 essential ceramides & hyaluronic acid, For dry to very dry skin, 454 g/16 oz
CeraVe Moisturising Cream, ...
CeraVe
Overall Score 84.0 83.0
Effectiveness 78.0/100 83.0/100
Best
Ingredient Quality 88.0/100
Best
81.0/100
Skin Compatibility 87.0/100
Best
85.0/100
Texture & UX 85.0/100
Best
77.0/100
Value for Money 93.0/100
Best
89.0/100
Best Price
£11.40
£10.26 Amazon UK →
-10% deal
£17.00
£13.11 Amazon UK →
-23% deal
Form N/A N/A
Dose N/A N/A
Third-Party Tested ✗ No ✗ No
Reviews Analysed 12 12

The Ordinary Natural Moisturizin...

Pros

  • Rich NMF complex (amino acids, sodium PCA, urea, lactate, polyglutamic acid) closely mirrors skin's own hydration factors
  • Fragrance-free, alcohol-free, silicone-free — excellent tolerability across skin types
  • Lightweight, fast-absorbing texture praised across reviews; works as makeup base
  • Outstanding value for money — clinically-inspired formulation at drugstore price

Cons

  • Primarily humectant-driven — lacks significant occlusive or emollient content for very dry or compromised skin barriers
  • Urea, while beneficial, can occasionally cause mild tingling on sensitised or freshly-exfoliated skin
  • One reviewer reported persistent dry patches despite consistent use — may need layering with a richer balm for dry skin types
  • Sodium hyaluronate sits lower in the INCI than ideal for HA-seekers; it supplements rather than leads the formula

Best For

normal to combination skin oily and acne-prone skin seeking lightweight hydration sensitive skin (fragrance-free, minimal irritants) layering under heavier creams or facial oils for dry skin morning routine base under SPF or makeup
View full review →

CeraVe Moisturising Cream, Face ...

Pros

  • Three physiological ceramides (NP, AP, EOP) plus cholesterol actively restore skin barrier lipid composition
  • Fragrance-free and alcohol-free formula — widely tolerated by sensitive and reactive skin types
  • Glycerin positioned early in the INCI ensures meaningful humectant concentration
  • 454 g pot offers excellent cost-per-use for a dermatologist-backed formulation

Cons

  • Rich, occlusive texture (cetearyl alcohol, dimethicone, caprylic/capric triglyceride) may clog pores for acne-prone or oily skin — moderate comedogenic risk
  • Sodium hyaluronate appears late in the INCI, suggesting a supporting rather than high-dose role
  • Pot packaging exposes cream to repeated finger contamination, which can degrade preservative efficacy over time
  • Not suitable as a standalone facial moisturiser for oily or combination skin types

Best For

dry to very dry skin (face and body) sensitive or reactive skin requiring fragrance-free formulas compromised skin barrier — eczema-prone, post-procedure, or scar tissue peri-menopausal skin with increased transepidermal water loss budget-conscious daily ceramide moisturiser
View full review →

Score Breakdown: The Ordinary NMF + HA vs CeraVe Moisturising Cream

The Ordinary NMF + HA Winner 84.0/100

The Ordinary NMF + HA is a minimalist, fragrance-free lightweight moisturiser built around a comprehensive Natural Moisturizing Factor complex — amino acids, sodium PCA, urea, lactate, and sodium hyaluronate — all skin-identical humectants that closely mimic the skin's own moisture-retention system.

Effectiveness
The Ordinary Nat..
78.0/100
CeraVe Moisturis..
83.0/100
Ingredient Quality
The Ordinary Nat..
88.0/100
CeraVe Moisturis..
81.0/100
Skin Compatibility
The Ordinary Nat..
87.0/100
CeraVe Moisturis..
85.0/100
Texture & UX
The Ordinary Nat..
85.0/100
CeraVe Moisturis..
77.0/100
Value for Money
The Ordinary Nat..
93.0/100
CeraVe Moisturis..
89.0/100

What are the key differences?

The Ordinary NMF + HA is best for: normal to combination skin, oily and acne-prone skin seeking lightweight hydration
CeraVe Moisturising Cream is best for: dry to very dry skin (face and body), sensitive or reactive skin requiring fragrance-free formulas

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, The Ordinary NMF + HA or CeraVe Moisturising Cream?
The Ordinary edges ahead with a higher overall score (84 vs 83) and a lower price (£11.40 vs £13.11), making it the better pick for oily, combination, or sensitive skin seeking lightweight daily hydration. Choose CeraVe instead if you have dry to very dry skin or a compromised barrier — its ceramide trio actively repairs skin lipids in a way The Ordinary's humectant-focused formula cannot match. The Ordinary NMF + HA scores 84.0/100 overall while CeraVe Moisturising Cream scores 83.0/100. The Ordinary NMF + HA comes out ahead, scoring higher on effectiveness (78.0 vs 83.0). The Ordinary NMF + HA is best suited for normal to combination skin and oily and acne-prone skin seeking lightweight hydration. CeraVe Moisturising Cream is better for dry to very dry skin (face and body) and sensitive or reactive skin requiring fragrance-free formulas.
Is The Ordinary NMF + HA worth the price compared to CeraVe Moisturising Cream?
The Ordinary NMF + HA costs £10.26 while CeraVe Moisturising Cream is £13.11. For value, The Ordinary NMF + HA scores 93.0/100 vs CeraVe Moisturising Cream's 89.0/100. The Ordinary NMF + HA delivers better value relative to its quality.

Related Product Comparisons

Disclaimer: AIScored provides data-driven comparisons based on publicly available reviews. This is not medical advice. Affiliate links may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you.

Feedback & Suggestions

Spotted an issue? Wrong price, incorrect data, or something else off? Let us know and we'll fix it.

Missing a product you'd like us to review? Tell us the product name and we'll consider adding it.