Skip to content

Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender vs Burgess Sensitive Senior Turkey

Side-by-side comparison of scores, ingredients, prices and real customer feedback for Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender and Burgess Sensitive Senior Turkey.

Last verified: 06 Mar 2026 · Based on 23 reviews

Our Verdict: Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender or Burgess Sensitive Senior Turkey?

Pooch & Mutt edges ahead with a higher score (77 vs 73) and stronger ingredient quality, making it the better pick for overweight dogs needing a proven, palatable diet food. Burgess Sensitive is the smarter buy for senior dogs aged 7+ on a budget — at £28.46 versus £47.00, it costs nearly half the price and suits sensitive stomachs well.

— AIScored Editorial Team

77.0
Score Summary

Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender scores 77.0/100 vs Burgess Sensitive Senior Turkey at 73.0/100. Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender wins on ingredient quality, nutritional value, transparency. Burgess Sensitive Senior Turkey is stronger on value for money.

Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender vs Burgess Sensitive Senior Turkey: What Does the Data Say?

Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender and Burgess Sensitive Senior serve quite different dogs despite both being dry kibble. The Pooch & Mutt formula is grain-free with 45% named chicken, designed specifically for weight loss in adult dogs — it scored 77/100 at £47 for 10kg. Burgess is built for dogs aged 7 and over, using turkey as the lead protein in a smaller kibble suited to older jaws, scoring 73/100 at a considerably lower £28.46 for 12.5kg.

If your dog is overweight, struggling with grain sensitivities, or has rejected other diet foods, the Pooch & Mutt is worth the premium — owners report genuine weight loss across fussy breeds. The caveat is that pea protein features in the recipe, and the FDA's ongoing DCM investigation into legume-heavy diets means a vet conversation is sensible for long-term feeding. Burgess makes more sense for a senior dog with a sensitive stomach or weaker teeth, and the value score of 78/100 reflects that significantly lower price per kilogram.

The practical catch with Burgess is transparency — the full ingredient list isn't published, so carbohydrate sources and the actual glucosamine content remain unverifiable. Neither product carries third-party certification, so both require some owner trust.

How Do the Scores Compare?

Pooch & Mutt - Slim & Slend...
Dry Senior Dog Food 7+ Rich...
Pooch & Mutt - Slim & Slender Complete Dry Dog Food Grain Free (Regular Sized Kibble), for Weight Control and Weight Loss, Chicken and Sweet Potato, 10kg
Pooch & Mutt - Slim & Slend...
Pooch & Mu
Dry Senior Dog Food 7+ Rich in Turkey, 12.5 kg
Dry Senior Dog Food 7+ Rich...
Burgess Sensitiv
Overall Score 77.0 73.0
Ingredient Quality 79.0/100
Best
70.0/100
Nutritional Value 71.0/100
Best
67.0/100
Value for Money 67.0/100 78.0/100
Best
Transparency 82.0/100
Best
66.0/100
Palatability 87.0/100
Best
82.0/100
Best Price
£59.99
£47.00 Amazon UK →
-22% deal
£29.29 Amazon UK →
Cheapest
Form
Dose
Third-Party Tested ✗ No ✗ No
Reviews Analysed 12 11

Pooch & Mutt - Slim & Slender Co...

Pros

  • 45% named chicken with no by-products or meat meal — highly transparent sourcing
  • Proven weight loss results reported across multiple breeds including fussy eaters (Akita, Labs, spaniels)
  • Excellent palatability — accepted even by dogs that rejected other diet foods
  • Good digestive tolerance — multiple reviewers note no stomach upset or loose stools

Cons

  • Premium price — reviewers explicitly note it is 'rather expensive'
  • Pea protein (a legume) raises ongoing concern linked to canine dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) under FDA investigation — consult vet for long-term use
  • Weight loss rate can be slow for some dogs — one owner notes 'small amount' of loss after several months
  • Labelled for adult dogs, not specifically formulated for senior nutritional requirements (reduced phosphorus, added joint support) despite appearing in a senior category

Best For

Overweight or spayed/neutered adult dogs needing calorie restriction Dogs with grain sensitivity or gluten intolerance Fussy eaters that have rejected other diet foods Dogs prone to digestive upset who need a simple, single-protein formula Owners wanting clean, clearly labelled ingredients without artificial additives
View full review →

Dry Senior Dog Food 7+ Rich in T...

Pros

  • Named turkey protein with no by-products or meat meal — honest, clear ingredient labelling
  • Strong owner-reported results for sensitive stomachs, firmer stools, and anal gland health
  • Small kibble size well-suited to senior dogs with reduced dental strength
  • Reported free from wheat and maize, reducing common dietary triggers

Cons

  • Full ingredient list not provided — carbohydrate sources, fibre type, and additive profile cannot be verified
  • Glucosamine and chondroitin quantities not declared, making joint support claims unverifiable
  • Mainstream processing standard — no fresh or raw meat; protein bioavailability lower than premium fresh-first brands
  • No third-party nutritional certification or feeding trial data disclosed

Best For

Senior dogs aged 7+ with sensitive stomachs or food intolerances Dogs previously reacting to wheat, maize, or common grain allergens Older dogs with reduced dental strength requiring smaller kibble Budget-conscious owners seeking a named-meat senior sensitive food at scale
View full review →

Score Breakdown: Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender vs Burgess Sensitive Senior Turkey

Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender Winner 77.0/100

Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender uses 45% named chicken as its sole animal protein — a high-quality, transparent choice with no by-products or meat meal.

Ingredient Quality
Pooch & Mutt - S..
79.0/100
Dry Senior Dog F..
70.0/100
Nutritional Value
Pooch & Mutt - S..
71.0/100
Dry Senior Dog F..
67.0/100
Value for Money
Pooch & Mutt - S..
67.0/100
Dry Senior Dog F..
78.0/100
Transparency
Pooch & Mutt - S..
82.0/100
Dry Senior Dog F..
66.0/100
Palatability
Pooch & Mutt - S..
87.0/100
Dry Senior Dog F..
82.0/100

What are the key differences?

Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender is best for: Overweight or spayed/neutered adult dogs needing calorie restriction, Dogs with grain sensitivity or gluten intolerance
Burgess Sensitive Senior Turkey is best for: Senior dogs aged 7+ with sensitive stomachs or food intolerances, Dogs previously reacting to wheat, maize, or common grain allergens

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender or Burgess Sensitive Senior Turkey?
Pooch & Mutt edges ahead with a higher score (77 vs 73) and stronger ingredient quality, making it the better pick for overweight dogs needing a proven, palatable diet food. Burgess Sensitive is the smarter buy for senior dogs aged 7+ on a budget — at £28.46 versus £47.00, it costs nearly half the price and suits sensitive stomachs well. Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender scores 77.0/100 overall while Burgess Sensitive Senior Turkey scores 73.0/100. Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender comes out ahead, scoring higher on effectiveness (0 vs 0). Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender is best suited for Overweight or spayed/neutered adult dogs needing calorie restriction and Dogs with grain sensitivity or gluten intolerance. Burgess Sensitive Senior Turkey is better for Senior dogs aged 7+ with sensitive stomachs or food intolerances and Dogs previously reacting to wheat, maize, or common grain allergens.
Is Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender worth the price compared to Burgess Sensitive Senior Turkey?
Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender costs £47.00 while Burgess Sensitive Senior Turkey is £29.29. For value, Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender scores 67.0/100 vs Burgess Sensitive Senior Turkey's 78.0/100. Burgess Sensitive Senior Turkey delivers better value relative to its quality.
Which has fewer side effects?
Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender scores 0/100 for side effects (higher means fewer reported issues) while Burgess Sensitive Senior Turkey scores 0/100. Both have similar side effect profiles based on user reviews. Always consult a healthcare professional before starting any supplement.

Related Product Comparisons

What the Data Says

Which senior dog food brands use named meat sources vs 'derivatives'?

All top 10 senior dog foods in our database use named meats and zero by-products. Across 20 scored products, the pattern is consistent: higher ingredient quality tracks with specific protein sourcing.

The top five by overall score:

  1. Naturediet Feel Good Wet (82/100, IQ 83) — chicken and turkey
  2. Pooch & Mutt Adult Minis (78/100, IQ 81) — chicken
  3. Pooch & Mutt Complete Senior (77/100, IQ 78) — chicken
  4. Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender (77/100, IQ 79) — chicken
  5. Skinner's Field & Trial Light & Senior (74/100, IQ 70) — chicken

The ingredient quality spread is 18 points (83 down to 65), and it tracks closely with how specific brands are about their protein sources.

Why it matters: "meat and animal derivatives" is a legal catch-all that lets manufacturers swap protein sources between batches. Named meats — "chicken 26%" or "turkey 30%" — lock the recipe down. For senior dogs with sensitive digestion, that consistency matters. Check the first three ingredients: if you see a specific animal name with a percentage, you know what your dog is eating.

Does senior dog food need to be grain-free?

The data says no. Our top-scoring senior dog food — Naturediet Feel Good Wet at 82/100 — contains grains and still outperforms every grain-free option in the category.

The top five is split on grain status:

  • Naturediet Feel Good Wet (82/100, IQ 83) — not grain-free
  • Pooch & Mutt Adult Minis (78/100, IQ 81) — grain-free
  • Pooch & Mutt Complete Senior (77/100, IQ 78) — grain-free
  • Pooch & Mutt Slim & Slender (77/100, IQ 79) — grain-free
  • Skinner's Field & Trial (74/100, IQ 70) — gluten-free, not grain-free

What actually separates good from mediocre senior dog food: named meat content, absence of by-products, and overall formulation quality. Grains like brown rice and oats provide fibre and slow-release energy that many senior dogs handle well.

The grain-free trend started from concerns about specific grain allergies — real, but uncommon. Unless your vet has identified a grain sensitivity, ingredient quality scores are a better predictor of food quality than the grain-free label alone.

Disclaimer: AIScored provides data-driven comparisons based on publicly available reviews. This is not medical advice. Affiliate links may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you.

Feedback & Suggestions

Spotted an issue? Wrong price, incorrect data, or something else off? Let us know and we'll fix it.

Missing a product you'd like us to review? Tell us the product name and we'll consider adding it.