Skip to content

Critical Mass Strawberry vs Optimum Serious Mass Choc Peanut Butter

Side-by-side comparison of scores, ingredients, prices and real customer feedback for Critical Mass Strawberry and Optimum Serious Mass Choc Peanut Butter.

Last verified: 01 Mar 2026 · Based on 13 reviews

Our Verdict: Critical Mass Strawberry or Optimum Serious Mass Choc Peanut Butter?

Applied Nutrition Critical Mass edges ahead with a higher overall score (74 vs 70) and Informed Sport certification, making it the safer pick for tested athletes. Optimum Nutrition Serious Mass suits budget-conscious hard gainers who prioritise raw calorie density and don't mind the higher sugar content.

— AIScored Editorial Team

74.0
Score Summary

Critical Mass Strawberry scores 74.0/100 vs Optimum Serious Mass Choc Peanut Butter at 70.0/100. Critical Mass Strawberry wins on ingredient quality, side effects, certifications. Optimum Serious Mass Choc Peanut Butter is stronger on effectiveness and value for money.

Critical Mass Strawberry vs Optimum Serious Mass Choc Peanut Butter: What Does the Data Say?

Applied Nutrition's Critical Mass scores higher overall (74/100 vs 70/100) but delivers fewer calories per serving than Serious Mass. Applied Nutrition hits 1,000+ calories at 150g per scoop, whereas Optimum Nutrition's Serious Mass reaches 1,263 kcal in roughly the same volume. Both include creatine monohydrate — Applied Nutrition adds HMB, glutamine, and CLA, while Optimum Nutrition uses a whey-casein blend for steady protein release.

Price matters. Serious Mass costs £40 versus Critical Mass at £52.95. Optimum Nutrition scores higher for both value (80/100 vs 71/100) and effectiveness (80/100 vs 73/100). However, Serious Mass packs 26g sugar per serving and 1.56g sodium — genuinely high if you're sodium-sensitive. Critical Mass avoids this but demands 150g powder per shake, which many struggle to consume in one sitting.

Pick Critical Mass if you want lower sugar and sodium with amino acid support. Choose Serious Mass for sheer calorie density and value, provided high sugar doesn't bother you. Taste varies: users report inconsistency with Critical Mass's strawberry, whilst Serious Mass's chocolate peanut butter delivers consistent flavour.

How Do the Scores Compare?

Critical Mass Professional ...
Serious Mass Chocolate Pean...
Critical Mass Professional Lean Mass Gainer Strawberry 6kg (40 Servings)
Critical Mass Professional ...
Applied Nutrition
Serious Mass Chocolate Peanut Butter 2.73kg
Serious Mass Chocolate Pean...
Optimum Nutrition
Overall Score 74.0 70.0
Effectiveness 73.0/100 80.0/100
Best
Ingredient Quality 76.0/100
Best
70.0/100
Value for Money 71.0/100 80.0/100
Best
Side Effects 77.0/100
Best
70.0/100
Certifications 83.0/100
Best
50.0/100
Best Price
£69.95
£59.30 Amazon UK →
-15% deal
£36.00 Holland & Barrett →
Cheapest
Form Powder powder
Dose None None
Third-Party Tested ✗ No ✗ No
Reviews Analysed 9 4

Critical Mass Professional Lean ...

Pros

  • 1,000+ calories per serving well-suited to hard gainers who struggle to hit caloric surplus
  • Informed Sport registered — meaningful third-party quality and contamination testing
  • Comprehensive formula beyond just protein: creatine monohydrate, HMB, glutamine, CLA, and MCT
  • Reduced-sugar formulation compared to older mass gainers — favourable for lean bulk

Cons

  • Taste inconsistency across batches — some report a chemical or medicinal aftertaste in the strawberry flavour
  • 150g per serving is a very high volume, potentially difficult for smaller individuals or those with lower appetite
  • Not vegan — whey-based formula unsuitable for plant-based users
  • 1,000+ kcal per serving requires careful use; excess can lead to unwanted fat gain if training volume is not sufficient

Best For

Hard gainers with high metabolic rates struggling to maintain caloric surplus Athletes in off-season or dedicated bulking phases Post-surgery or illness recovery requiring rapid caloric replenishment Halal diet followers seeking a certified mass gainer Intermediate lifters wanting an all-in-one mass-gain stack without separate creatine or HMB supplements
View full review →

Serious Mass Chocolate Peanut Bu...

Pros

  • Extremely high calorie density (1,263 kcal/serving) designed specifically for muscle gain
  • Substantial protein content (50g per serving) with dual whey/casein blend for sustained release
  • Added creatine monohydrate (3g/serving) supports strength and performance
  • Complete micronutrient profile with 25 vitamins and minerals at therapeutic doses

Cons

  • Very high sugar content (26g per serving) unsuitable for those managing blood glucose
  • High sodium per serving (1.56g, 26% RDA) may concern sodium-sensitive individuals
  • Large serving size (334g powder + 710ml water) makes it inconvenient for on-the-go use
  • Contains multiple allergens: milk, soy, wheat, egg; not suitable for allergic individuals

Best For

Hard gainers struggling to consume sufficient calories Bodybuilders and strength athletes in muscle-building phases Post-workout recovery nutrition Individuals aged 18-45 with no blood glucose or sodium concerns
View full review →

Score Breakdown: Critical Mass Strawberry vs Optimum Serious Mass Choc Peanut Butter

Critical Mass Strawberry Winner 74.0/100

Applied Nutrition Critical Mass Professional is a high-calorie lean mass gainer delivering 1,000+ calories and 42g of protein per 150g serving, built around ISO-XP 95% Whey Protein Isolate with added creatine monohydrate, HMB, glutamine, leucine, CLA, and MCT powder.

Effectiveness
Critical Mass Pr..
73.0/100
Serious Mass Cho..
80.0/100
Ingredient Quality
Critical Mass Pr..
76.0/100
Serious Mass Cho..
70.0/100
Value for Money
Critical Mass Pr..
71.0/100
Serious Mass Cho..
80.0/100
Side Effects
Critical Mass Pr..
77.0/100
Serious Mass Cho..
70.0/100
Certifications
Critical Mass Pr..
83.0/100
Serious Mass Cho..
50.0/100

What are the key differences?

Critical Mass Strawberry is best for: Hard gainers with high metabolic rates struggling to maintain caloric surplus, Athletes in off-season or dedicated bulking phases
Optimum Serious Mass Choc Peanut Butter is best for: Hard gainers struggling to consume sufficient calories, Bodybuilders and strength athletes in muscle-building phases

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Critical Mass Strawberry or Optimum Serious Mass Choc Peanut Butter?
Applied Nutrition Critical Mass edges ahead with a higher overall score (74 vs 70) and Informed Sport certification, making it the safer pick for tested athletes. Optimum Nutrition Serious Mass suits budget-conscious hard gainers who prioritise raw calorie density and don't mind the higher sugar content. Critical Mass Strawberry scores 74.0/100 overall while Optimum Serious Mass Choc Peanut Butter scores 70.0/100. Critical Mass Strawberry comes out ahead, scoring higher on effectiveness (73.0 vs 80.0). Critical Mass Strawberry is best suited for Hard gainers with high metabolic rates struggling to maintain caloric surplus and Athletes in off-season or dedicated bulking phases. Optimum Serious Mass Choc Peanut Butter is better for Hard gainers struggling to consume sufficient calories and Bodybuilders and strength athletes in muscle-building phases.
Is Critical Mass Strawberry worth the price compared to Optimum Serious Mass Choc Peanut Butter?
Critical Mass Strawberry costs £59.30 while Optimum Serious Mass Choc Peanut Butter is £36.00. For value, Critical Mass Strawberry scores 71.0/100 vs Optimum Serious Mass Choc Peanut Butter's 80.0/100. Optimum Serious Mass Choc Peanut Butter delivers better value relative to its quality. Note that Critical Mass Strawberry comes as powder while Optimum Serious Mass Choc Peanut Butter is powder, which may affect your preference.
Which has fewer side effects?
Critical Mass Strawberry scores 77.0/100 for side effects (higher means fewer reported issues) while Optimum Serious Mass Choc Peanut Butter scores 70.0/100. Reviewers report fewer side effects with Critical Mass Strawberry. For certification and testing, Critical Mass Strawberry scores 83.0/100 vs Optimum Serious Mass Choc Peanut Butter's 50.0/100. Always consult a healthcare professional before starting any supplement.

Related Product Comparisons

Disclaimer: AIScored provides data-driven comparisons based on publicly available reviews. This is not medical advice. Affiliate links may earn us a commission at no extra cost to you.

Feedback & Suggestions

Spotted an issue? Wrong price, incorrect data, or something else off? Let us know and we'll fix it.

Missing a product you'd like us to review? Tell us the product name and we'll consider adding it.